Is Vaping Health Risky?
Is Vaping Health Risky?
The writer examines the possible social and health benefits of adolescent smoking, while also considering potential harm. She identifies e-cigarettes as electronic cigarettes but calls them a tobacco product. The authors explore the different options available for teens in light of the fact that smoking has turned into a socially unacceptable behavior. She argues that people should consider the social norms that promote smoking to teens, while also considering the dangers of nicotine addiction. The author also examines the difference between teenage smoking and adult smoking. After reviewing the literature, I trust her that e-cigarette vaporizers are a harmless option to smoking, if used correctly.
A lot of the data on smoking and its risks comes from adults, which helps it be hard to assess how the risks are reduced by e-smoking. It’s estimated that approximately fourteen thousand deaths every year are because of smoking. This figure is probable an underestimation, since many deaths may be the result of second hand smoke. In addition, it assumes that folks who vapinger.com smoke don’t plan to do so.
The writer suggests that we should think about the fact that e-cigarettes mimic the result of tobacco products, while providing a far less harmful experience. The problem with this approach is that it treats all smoking as dangerous, though it isn’t. Many people don’t realize how similar the taste of a cigarette to a vaporizer, or how similar the physical act of smoking is to smoking. Furthermore, it presumes that people who utilize the cigarettes aren’t taking any real risks. The argument that comes from this is that because e smokers don’t feel the physical effects of smoking, they can’t be deemed to be causing these deaths, if they are.
However, it is important to remember that smoking cigarettes and using vaporizers are both virtually identical behaviors. What makes vaporizing unique is that it allows a smoker to achieve the same effect as smoking, minus the associated risks. Vaporizing provides a highly similar experience as smoking. This means that vapers may be increasing their chances of quitting the habit. In addition, it means that they are taking steps in the direction of protecting their health while simultaneously increasing the chance of enjoying a wholesome lifestyle.
The author makes some valid points concerning the dangers of smoking. He also makes some valid criticisms of having less nicotine, and of the dangers of carbon monoxide smoke. However, his real issue is among regulation. He argues that e-cigarette companies must not be permitted to advertise their products as safe when all they have done is increase the quantity of chemicals and additives that are present in traditional cigarettes. The issue with this argument is that we have already seen the negative effects of increased degrees of these chemicals in traditional cigarettes.
We already have countless reports concerning the negative side effects of nicotine, especially in smokers trying to quit. We already have a lot of stories concerning the rise of cancers and respiratory problems due to long-term nicotine use. It’s true that e-cigs don’t contain any nicotine, but that hasn’t stopped them from being advertised as a cure-all for smoking. E Cigarettes have certainly been an important factor in the spike in smoking-related deaths over the past few years.
The author does not appear to recognize the irony of arguing against smoking by way of a healthier alternative, but doesn’t appear to consider the potential negative health ramifications of his product either. He also discounts the idea that smokers who switch to the cigarettes will eventually reverse to cigarette smoking. He appears to think that all we need to do to beat cigarettes would be to reduce the quantity of nicotine we take in. The fact is that smokers who try to quit often do so due to other health issues, and aren’t just turning to the cigarettes to get from their bad habits. There are lots of reasons why people smoke. The author has basically ignored every one of them in his arguments against vaping.
While it holds true that the cigarettes do not contain any real tobacco, a number of the chemicals found in using tobacco are located in the smokes. The author seems to be of the belief that all we need to do to solve the problem of smoking is to decrease the amount of chemicals we take in through our lungs. The argument he presents is simply not located in sound scientific fact. There is absolutely no real proof that reducing how much chemicals we take in improves anything other than our health. The author also discounts the theory that the cigarettes are less dangerous than regular cigarettes since they don’t contain the harmful chemicals found in regular cigarettes.